United States v. Patricia D. Edwards, A/K/A Patricia D. Lancaster, & Michael W. Lancaster, Clover M. Farms, Inc., Garnishee, 103 F.3d 121 (4th Cir. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Patricia D. Edwards, A/K/A Patricia D. Lancaster, & Michael W. Lancaster, Clover M. Farms, Inc., Garnishee, 103 F.3d 121 (4th Cir. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Davis (nced, 2013-04-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Davis
E.D.N.C. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bullard, 103 F.3d 121 , 1996 WL 683790, at *3 (4th Cir. Nov. 27, 1996) (unpublished table decision) (seizure of a firearm found in an armoir by police searching for evidence of bank fraud met the first two conditions in the plain view analysis where a search was valid under the good faith exception and the firearm was found in a place where evidence of bank fraud could be found).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Frye
5th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Davis, 103 F.3d 121 (4th Cir.1996) (unpublished). 1 For the above reasons, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Frye’s appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion to direct his discharged counsel to return his case file.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Crum
D. Maryland · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Crum, 103 F.3d 121 , 1996 WL 698065 (4th Cir. Dec.6, 1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Patricia D. Edwards, A/K/A Patricia D. Lancaster, and Michael W. Lancaster, Clover M. Farms, Incorporated, Garnishee
95-2874.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 4, 1996.
103 F.3d 121
Unpublished

103 F.3d 121

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Patricia D. EDWARDS, a/k/a Patricia D. Lancaster, Defendant-Appellant,
and
Michael W. Lancaster, Defendant,
CLOVER M. FARMS, INCORPORATED, Garnishee.

No. 95-2874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1996.
Decided December 4, 1996.

Patricia D. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.

Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the Appellee a deficiency judgment against her. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Edwards, No. CA-94-685-5-FD (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16 & Aug. 23, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.