Levene & Eisenberg v. Gold Coast Asset Acquisition, L. P., 119 S. Ct. 1035 (1999).

Levene & Eisenberg v. Gold Coast Asset Acquisition, L. P., 119 S. Ct. 1035 (1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published Issue: likely effect errorWV ↗ Issue: given defenseWV ↗ Issue: after-acquired evidence doctrineNJ ↗ Issue: unless errorWV ↗ 2.0 score

17 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: State ex rel. Brandon L. v. Moats, 551 S.E.2d 674 (W. Va. 2001)

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

State ex rel. Brandon L. v. Moats, 551 S.E.2d 674 (W. Va. 2001).published 4 cites

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 13

Cited "see, e.g." 4

Treatment by court

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

LEVENE & EISENBERG
v.
GOLD COAST ASSET ACQUISITION, L. P.

No. 98-940.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Feb 22, 1999.

Published opinion

119 S. Ct. 1035

1999 U.S. LEXIS 1086

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Your account