Melsome Nelson-Richards, ph.d. v. The Bd. of Trs. of Montgomery Cmty. Coll. Robert E. Parilla, Dr., 107 F.3d 867 (4th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Melsome Nelson-Richards, ph.d. v. The Bd. of Trs. of Montgomery Cmty. Coll. Robert E. Parilla, Dr., 107 F.3d 867 (4th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Melsome Nelson-Richards, ph.d.
v.
The Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College Robert E. Parilla, Dr.
96-2313.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 25, 1997.
Unpublished opinion
107 F.3d 867
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7457
1997 WL 76898

107 F.3d 867

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melsome NELSON-RICHARDS, Ph.D., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The BOARD of Trustees of Montgomery Community College;
Robert E. Parilla, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-2313.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1997.
Decided Feb. 25, 1997.

Melsome Nelson-Richards, Appellant Pro Se. Linda B. Thall, Senior Assistant County Attorney, Sharon Veronica Burrell, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Rockville, MD; Darrell Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SHEEHAN, Baltimore, MD; Joan I. Gordon, General Counsel, MONTGOMERY COLLEGE, Rockville, MD, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Appellant's employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nelson-Richards v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, No. CA-93-323-W (D. Md. July 25 & Sept. 9, 1994; July 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED