neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
0.2 score
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF EDWIN FISHER AND HARRY SZKOLAR, APPLICANTS, FOR AN ORDER ADJUDICATING CHAPTER 152 OF THE LAWS OF 1962 TO BE NULL AND VOID IN ACCORDANCE WITH REVISED STATUTES OF NEW JERSEY 1:7-4 AS AMENDED. EDWIN FISHER AND HARRY SZKOLAR, APPLICANTS-APPELLANTS
v.
ARTHUR J. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND HERMAN ADES AND ABE STERN, ETC.S., INTERVENERS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
v.
ARTHUR J. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND HERMAN ADES AND ABE STERN, ETC.S., INTERVENERS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 16, 1964.
Published opinion
Mr. Stephen B. Wiley argued the cause for applicants-appellants (Messrs. Meyner <& Wiley, attorneys)., Mr. David J. Goldberg, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney)., Mr. Harold H. Fisher argued the cause for interyeners-defendants-respondents (Messrs. Shanley & Fisher, attorneys; Mr. John Kandravy, on the brief).
Affirmance, Cueiam, Francis, Hall, Jacobs, Man, None, Proctor, Reversal, Sohettiko, Tlane, Wein, Xraub.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Per. Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion by Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division. 80 N. J. Super. 523 (1963).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiN'xraub, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, Hall, Sohettiko and TlANE-MAN-7. For reversal — None.