green
Positive treatment
Issue: judicial estoppel doctrineNJ ↗
Issue: legal malpractice claimNJ ↗
Issue: field sobriety testNJ ↗
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Kelly v. Berlin
See Gautam v. De Luca, 215 N.J.Super. 388, 398 , 521 A.2d 1343 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 109 N.J. 39 , 532 A.2d 1107 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Kozlov, Seaton, Romanini & Brooks, P.C.
Co., 142 N.J. 590, 601 , 667 A.2d 670 (1995) (quoting Osborne v. O’Reilly, 267 N.J.Super. 329, 331 , 631 A.2d 577 (Law Div.1993)); see also Gautam v. De Luca, 215 N.J.Super. 388, 397 , 521 A.2d 1343 (“[T]he measure of damages is ordinarily the amount that the client would have received but for his attorney’s negligence.”), certif. denied, 109 N.J. 39 , 532 A.2d 1107 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schillaci v. First Fidelity Bank
As in Lingar v. Live-In Companions, Inc., 300 N.J.Super. 22 , 692 A.2d 61 (App.Div.1997), where the plaintiffs claimed they were “emotionally traumatized” by the defendant’s fraud, although Ms. Schillaci was “ ‘acutely upset’ by reason of the incident, [her] emotional distress was not ‘sufficiently substantial to result in physical illness or serious psychological sequelae.’ ” Id. at 27, 35 , 692 A.2d 61 (quoting Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 253 , 473 A.2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A.2d 127 (1984)); see also, Gautam v. De Luca, 215 N.J.Super. 388…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lingar v. Live-In Companions, Inc.
While both plaintiffs were “acutely upset” by reason of the incident, their emotional distress was not “sufficiently substantial to result in physical illness or serious psychological sequelae.” Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 253 , 473 A.2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A.2d 127 (1984); see also Gautam v. De Luca, 215 N.J.Super. 388, 399 , 521 A.2d 1343 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 109 N.J. 39 , 532 A.2d 1107 (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
v.
TIMOTHY LOYLE
v.
TIMOTHY LOYLE
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 6, 1987.
Published
Petition for certification denied.