Nash v. Lerner, 724 A.2d 798 (N.J. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Nash v. Lerner, 724 A.2d 798 (N.J. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

AMELIA NASH AND FRED NASH, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS
v.
BELLA LERNER, AND JOHN DOES, TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, AND RICHARD ROES
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 17, 1999.
Published opinion
724 A.2d 798
1999 N.J. LEXIS 81
R. Peter Connell argued the cause for appellant (Connell & Connell, attorneys; Mr. Connell and Ronald S. Yuro, on the briefs)., Michael A. Cohan argued the cause for respondents.
Pollock.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Rodriguez, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 193, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

Justice POLLOCK has filed a separate dissenting opinion.

Dissent

POLLOCK, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Shebell’s majority opinion, reported at 311 N.J.Super. 183, 709 A.2d 799 (1998).

For reversal — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice POLLOCK — 1.