green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Cited for
At page 1276 Defining municipal liability under monell policy requirements6 citing cases
- Connell v. Centurion of Florida LLC, No. 3:23-cv-00152 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 8, 2025).Under the directives of Monell, a plaintiff also must allege that the constitutional deprivation resulted from “an official government policy, the actions of an official fairly deemed to represent government policy, or a custom or practice…
- Herndon v. Corizon of Florida, LLC., No. 3:20-cv-00616 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 7, 2023).Under the directives of Monell, a plaintiff also must allege that the constitutional deprivation was the result of “an official government policy, the actions of an official fairly deemed to represent government policy, or a custom or prac…
- Lofton v. Espino, No. 3:20-cv-01081 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 5, 2020).Under the directives of Monell, a plaintiff also must allege that the constitutional deprivation was the result of “an official government policy, the actions of an official fairly deemed to represent government policy, or a custom or prac…
- Adorjan v. Armor Corr. Health Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00943 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 2, 2020).Under the directives of Monell, a plaintiff also must allege that the constitutional deprivation was the result of “an official government policy, the actions of an official fairly deemed to represent government policy, or a custom or prac…
- Adorjan v. Armor Corr. Health Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00525 (M.D. Fla. June 2, 2020).Under the directives of Monell, a plaintiff also must allege that the constitutional deprivation was the result of “an official government policy, the actions of an official fairly deemed to represent government policy, or a custom or prac…
- James Hill v. Jeanne Dunaway, No. 13-15444 (11th Cir. Aug. 12, 2015).publishedA municipality therefore may be held liable “only if such constitutional torts result from an official government policy, the actions of an official fairly deemed to represent government policy, or a custom or practice so pervasive and wel…
At page 1269 cited at this page1 citing case
- Gable, Casey v. City of Chicago, 296 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 2002).published See id. at 1269, 1277 .
Other citing cases
- Chaney v. Fayette Cnty. Pub. Sch. Dist., 977 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (N.D. Ga. 2013).published
- Summers v. City of Dothan, 757 F. Supp. 2d 1184 (M.D. Ala. 2010).published
- Joe Marsh v. Butler Cnty., 268 F.3d 1014 (11th Cir. 2001).published
- Joe Marsh v. Butler Cnty., 225 F.3d 1243 (11th Cir. 2000).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniel WEBSTER and Peggy Webster, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants, Webster Green Thumb Company, and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,
v.
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, Mike Kenn; Michael Hightower, Et Al., Defendants-Cross-Appellees
v.
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, Mike Kenn; Michael Hightower, Et Al., Defendants-Cross-Appellees
99-12216.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jul 19, 2000.
Published opinion
Deborah Mclver Floyd, The Floyd Law Offices, Peachtree City, GA, Charles George Hicks, Atlanta, GA, Donald B. Ver-rilli, Jr., Jenner & Block, Washington, DC, for Fulton County, Ga., Richmond Mason Barge, Parks, Chesin & Miller, P.C., Patrick W. McKee, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.
Anderson, Dubina, Hill, Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Georgia (1)
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 19 2000
No. 99-12216
THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 96-02399-CV-TWT-1
DANIEL WEBSTER and
PEGGY WEBSTER, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,
WEBSTER GREEN THUMB COMPANY,
and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
versus
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA,
Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
MIKE KENN; MICHAEL HIGHTOWER, et al.,
Defendants-Cross-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
(July 19, 2000)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, DUBINA and HILL, Circuit Judges.
[*~1267–1270]IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 19 2000
No. 99-12216
THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 96-02399-CV-TWT-1
DANIEL WEBSTER and
PEGGY WEBSTER, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants,
WEBSTER GREEN THUMB COMPANY,
and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
versus
FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA,
Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
MIKE KENN; MICHAEL HIGHTOWER, et al.,
Defendants-Cross-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
(July 19, 2000)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, DUBINA and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[*~1267–1271]The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the district court published at 51 F.Supp.2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 1999).
[*~1282–1285]AFFIRMED.[1]
1 We decline to address appellants’ challenge to the scope of the injunction. The argument was not presented to the district court; rather, it was raised for the first time on appeal.