green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Riso
See In re Coones, 954 F.2d 596 (10th Cir.1992), reh’g denied (Feb. 14, 1992), cert. granted and judgment vacated — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 31 , 121 L.Ed.2d 4 (1992), motion for clarification denied — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 402 , 121 L.Ed.2d 328 (1992), on remand 996 F.2d 250 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 684 , 126 L.Ed.2d 651 (1994); In re Peterson, 920 F.2d 1389, 1393-1394 , 122 B.R. [20] (8th Cir.1990); Matter of Sherk, 918 F.2d 1170, 1174 , 121 B.R. [46] (5th Cir.1990); and In re Dembs, 757 F.2d 777 , 780, 48 B.R. [14] (6th Cir.1985); but see Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, 938 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Albert COONES
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
No. 91-1793.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1992.
113 S. Ct. 402
Published
The motion of petitioner for clarification is denied.