Est. of Robbins v. Schilling, 200 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). · Go Syfert
Est. of Robbins v. Schilling, 200 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ESTATE of Florence N. ROBBINS
v.
John SCHILLING
No. 66-951.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 18, 1967.
Published opinion
200 So. 2d 646
1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4546
Martin Lemlich, Miami, for appellant., Louis Schwartzkopf, Miami Beach, for appellee.
Barkdull, Hendry, Pearson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment entered against the estate of Florence N. Robbins, deceased, in an action on two promissory notes.

Appellant contends (1) that the trial court erred in striking the answer of the executor of the estate for his failure to pay the fee of the administrator ad litem, and (2) that the court erred in permitting the appellee-plaintiff to testify as to transactions with the deceased, Florence N. Robbins.

We find merit in both contentions and reverse. See § 90.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Reversed and remanded.