Armour Creameries v. Par., 203 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1967). · Go Syfert
Armour Creameries v. Par., 203 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ARMOUR CREAMERIES, Self-Insured
v.
Jessie v. PARISH and Florida Industrial Commission
No. 36633.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Oct 11, 1967.
Published opinion
203 So. 2d 157
E. O. Palermo, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for petitioner., John A. Williamson, of Barrs, Garnett & Williamson, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.
Caldwell, Drew, Ervin, Thomas, Thornal.
Published
PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

Wé find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The attorney for the respondent Jessie V. Parish is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.