Stoller v. Folmar, 260 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). · Go Syfert
Stoller v. Folmar, 260 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leon J. Stoller
v.
Oliver W. Folmar
No. 71-703.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 4, 1972.
Published opinion
260 So. 2d 532
1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6977
Prunty, Ross, DeLoach & Olsen, Miami, for appellant., Horton, Schwartz & Perse, and Clinton W. Green, Miami, for appellee.
Barkdull, Hendry, Pearson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals a summary final judgment in an action concerning a referral contract between two practicing attorneys. In the trial court, the sole issue was the meaning of the written contract. The matters pleaded in the answer did not constitute a legal defense to the action. The court correctly determined that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the appellee was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The court properly entered summary judgment in accordance with the terms of the contract. See Duprey v. United Services Automobile Association, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 57; also see Sterling v. Miller, 1956, 2 A.D.2d 900, 157 N.Y.S.2d 145.

Affirmed.