Clark v. State, 275 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Clark v. State, 275 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles CLARK
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 72-726.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 3, 1973.
Published opinion
275 So. 2d 571
1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7080
Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and John Lipinski, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Haverfield, Hendry, Martin, Sack.
Published
PER CURIAM.

These appellants were tried jointly and found guilty of robbery by a jury. They were each sentenced to a term of twenty years in the State Penitentiary.

[*572] lt is their contention on appeal that the trial court erred in denying their motions for a mistrial and a severance.

We have carefully considered appellants’ points in the light of the record on appeal and briefs and have concluded that they are without merit and that no reversible error has been made to appear. Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 901; Reis v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 666; Woodside v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 426; Washington v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 210 So.2d 290.

Affirmed.