Merrill v. Cnty. of Dade, 277 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1973). · Go Syfert
Merrill v. Cnty. of Dade, 277 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Quick Summary

The Supreme Court of Florida affirms the validation of Dade County general obligation bonds approved by the electorate in a special bond election.

The circuit court validates several Dade County bond issues totaling $553,100,000, which were authorized by county ordinances and approved by voters in a special election. The appellants challenge the validity of these general obligation bonds, which fund projects including sanitary sewerage, transportation, street improvements, waste disposal, libraries, health care, and a zoological park. The Supreme Court of Florida reviews the objections raised by the appellants and finds them without merit. The court affirms the lower court’s judgment validating the bonds, concluding that the issuance procedures complied with legal requirements and the electorate properly approved the proposals.

2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark MERRILL
v.
COUNTY OF DADE
No. 43455.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 16, 1973.
Published opinion
277 So. 2d 783
1973 Fla. LEXIS 4525
Arthur Newman and David Cerf, Jr., Miami, for appellants., Stuart Simon, County Atty., and Robert A. Ginsburg, Asst. County Atty., for appel-lees.
Adkins, Boyd, Carlton, Dekle, Ervin, McCain, Roberts.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
BOYD, Justice.

This cause is before us on direct appeal to review the decision of the Circuit Court, Dade county, validating several Dade County bond issues in the total amount of $553,100,000.0o.[1] The Court found that on October 4, 1972, the Board of Commissioners of Dade County adopted Resolution No. R-1466-72 providing for the holding of a special bond election on November 7, 1972, to consider the following bond proposals :

“Ordinance No. 72-63
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $50,000,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for providing sanitary sewerage systems and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance No. 72-64
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $132,500,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for providing a unified transportation system and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance No. 72-65
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $113,500,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for providing street and safety improvements and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance No. 72-66
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $50,000,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for providing solid waste disposal facilities and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance No. 72-67
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $34,700,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for constructing and improving public library buildings in the County Public Library System and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance No. 72-68
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $88,600,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida for providing health[*785] care facilities and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance 72-69
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $75,800,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for providing health care facilities and providing an effective date;
“Ordinance 72-72
“Ordinance authorizing the issuance subject to the election herein provided for, of not exceeding $8,000,000 general obligation bonds of the County of Dade, Florida, for providing a zoological park and providing an effective date.” •

All of the foregoing bond proposals were duly approved by the electorate in the special bond election of November 7, 1972.[2]

We have carefully weighed the objections raised by the Appellants and have found the same to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the lower court, validating the bonds in question, is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ-, concur.
1

Civil Action No. 72-25341, Jan. 25,1973, as amended, Feb. 8,1973.

2

Two other proposals were adopted at the October 4, 1972 meeting. However, these were rejected by the voters on November 7, 1972, and consequently are not involved in the instant trial and appeal.