State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Leesville Lumber Co., 295 So. 2d 451 (La. Ct. App. 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Leesville Lumber Co., 295 So. 2d 451 (La. Ct. App. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, and
v.
LEESVILLE LUMBER COMPANY, and
No. 4563.
Louisiana Court of Appeal.
May 24, 1974.
Published opinion
295 So. 2d 451
1974 La. App. LEXIS 4302
Makar & Whitaker by John B. Whitaker, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellee-ap-pellant., Appeal from the Tenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Natchitoches, Peyton Cunningham, Jr., Judge., William E. Tilley, Leesville, for defendant and appellant., Brittain and Williams by Jack O. Brit-tain, Natchitoches, for plaintiffs and appel-lees., Gahagan and Gahagan by Russell E. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for defendants and appellants.
Culpepper, Miller, Watson.
Published
CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a companion case to Tommy E. Smith, et al. v. The Hartford Insurance Group et al., La.App., 295 So.2d 447 in which a separate opinion is rendered by us this date.- In the present case, the plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, carried liability and extended coverage insurance on the Smith vehicle. It paid to the Smiths the sum of $2,000 in medical expenses and $914.36 for repairs to their vehicle. Judgment for these amounts was rendered in favor of State Farm and against the defendants, Rotary Sowell, William Baggett and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, in solido. These defendant appealed.

For the reasons stated in the companion case, the judgment in the present matter is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants who are cast.

Affirmed.