Jackson v. Zito, 320 So. 2d 551 (La. 1975). · Go Syfert
Jackson v. Zito, 320 So. 2d 551 (La. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Cited for
At page 553 Rejecting the notion of first amendment infringement2 citing cases
  • McNary v. Sidak, 478 So. 2d 712 (La. Ct. App. 1985).published
    The First Circuit, in Cherokee Restaurant, rejected the notion of Jackson v. Zito, 314 So.2d 401 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1975), writs den. 320 So.2d 551, 553 (La. 1975), and its progeny that there existed a ten year period of liberative prescrip…
  • Arceneaux v. Motor Veh. Cas. Co., 341 So. 2d 1287 (La. Ct. App. 1977).published
    There must also be reasonable diligence on the part of the plaintiff to ascertain the identity of the party injuring him and the means of knowledge are the same in effect as knowledge itself, Martin v. Mud Supply Company, Inc., 239 La. 616…
Russell L. JACKSON
v.
James ZITO
No. 56697.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 26, 1975.
Published opinion
320 So. 2d 551
1975 La. LEXIS 3874
Calogero, Grant, Summers, Writ.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

In re: James Zito, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 314 So.2d 401.

Writ refused. Since the case has been remanded, the judgment is not final.

Dissent

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted for the reasons that the question is of widespread interest and because, in my view, the judgment of the Court of Appeal to the effect that prescription of ten years is applicable to this malpractice suit is erroneous.

CALOGERO, J., would grant this writ.