Bruton v. State, 326 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). · Go Syfert
Bruton v. State, 326 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lyman BRUTON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 74-1503.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 18, 1975.
Published opinion
326 So. 2d 186
1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19096
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Elliot R. Brooks, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Cross, Mager, Walden.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant, Lyman Bruton, was charged by information with, in count one, attempted breaking and entering of an automobile with intent to commit larceny and, in count two possession of burglary tools. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a verdict finding the defendant guilty of both counts as charged. The defendant was adjudged guilty and sentenced to one year in county jail on the first count and three years in state prison on the second count, the sentences to run concurrently.

We have examined the points on appeal raised by the defendant and find them to be without merit. However, the court, sua sponte, notes that each of the two counts in the information filed against the defendant involved a facet or phase of the same criminal transaction. In such a case, only one sentence may be imposed and that sentence should be imposed for the higher offense. Foster v. State, 286 So.2d 549 (Fla.1973); Kirkland v. State, 299 So.2d 54 (Fla.App.1974); Wyche v. State, 178 So.2d 875 (Fla.App.1965).

Accordingly, the sentence on Count I of the information is vacated and set aside. The judgment and sentence on Count II of the information is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.