Lumilite Indus., Inc. v. Se. Life Ins., 365 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). · Go Syfert
Lumilite Indus., Inc. v. Se. Life Ins., 365 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LUMILITE INDUSTRIES, INC., and Tessie Kaufman
v.
SOUTHEAST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Bank of Kendale
No. 78-747.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jan 9, 1979.
Published opinion
365 So. 2d 1083
1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14125
Robert C. Eber, Miami, for appellants., Krongold & Bass and Paul H. Bass, Miami, for appellees.
Kehoe, Pearson, Schwartz.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs, beneficiaries in a life insurance contract, sued their insurance carrier for failure to pay benefits upon a controverted claim. They added a count claiming an independent tort for the failure to pay the claim, alleging bad faith on the part of the insurance company and failure to make a proper investigation of the claim. Discovery was had and, upon both parties moving for summary judgment, affidavits were filed. The trial court entered a partial summary judgment holding that there were no genuine issues of material fact on count two, which claimed punitive damages, and that the defendant insurance company was entitled to a summary judgment on that count. This appeal is from that partial summary judgment.

The trial judge correctly determined that there were no genuine issues of material fact with regard to the allegations in count two. The defendant was entitled to summary judgment under the rule set forth in Allstate Insurance Company v. Gibbs, 340 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). See also Baxter v. Royal Indemnity Company, 285 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973).

Affirmed.