Shaw v. Louisiana Dep't of Educ., 377 So. 2d 492 (La. Ct. App. 1979). · Go Syfert
Shaw v. Louisiana Dep't of Educ., 377 So. 2d 492 (La. Ct. App. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Michael D. SHAW
v.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, and Department of Employment Security
No. 6762.
Louisiana Court of Appeal.
Nov 12, 1979.
Published opinion
377 So. 2d 492
1979 La. App. LEXIS 3319
L. Paul Gianfala, Church Point, Julius X. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant., John E. Demoruelle, Kinder, for plaintiff-appellee.
Culpepper, Guidry, Swift.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
GUIDRY, Judge.

This matter was previously before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal of appellant, Louisiana Department of Education, on the ground that the appellant did not perfect its devolutive appeal within the delay allowed by law. LSA-C.C.P. Article 2087.

Upon initial consideration we concluded that appellant’s appeal was untimely, the order of appeal having been signed two days following expiration of the delay provided for in C.C.P. Article 2087. However, in the interest of justice we remanded this matter to the trial court for the purpose of having that court conduct a hearing to determine if the appeal order had been timely presented, i. e., whether the failure to perfect the appeal within the delay allowed resulted from the failure of the trial court to sign the appeal order after it had been timely presented. 366 So.2d 1070 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1979).

Pursuant to remand the trial court conducted a hearing and concluded, as reflected by formal judgment signed May 2, 1979, that the motion for appeal filed by The Department of Education was actually received and filed by the Clerk of Court of Allen Parish, Louisiana, and signed by the trial judge on June 28, 1978, two days following expiration of the delay for appealing. No appeal has been taken from the judgment last referred to and same is now final.

Accordingly, we determine that the appeal taken by appellant, THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, is untimely and must be dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.