Brown v. Sunland Training Ctr., 409 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). · Go Syfert
Brown v. Sunland Training Ctr., 409 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 1080 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Sunland Ctr. at Miami v. Brown, 438 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).published
    Accordingly, this court reversed and remanded for that determination, stating that the deputy might “take further evidence as may be absolutely necessary for the limited purpose of determining the date of total maximum medical improvement.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Earlene BROWN
v.
SUNLAND TRAINING CENTER, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Crawford and Company, and the Bureau of Workmen's Compensation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants
No. YY-478.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 5, 1982.
Published opinion
409 So. 2d 1080
1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18860
Peter S. Schwedock, of Pelzner, Schwe-dock, Finkelstein & Klausner, P. A., Miami, for appellant., Jerry V. Wilkey, Coral Gables, for appel-lees/ cross-appellants.
Booth, Shivers, Smith.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals and the employer/carrier cross-appeal from a workers’ compensation order awarding claimant 27% permanent partial disability benefits of the body as a whole due to her partial loss of hearing and orthopedic and psychiatric problems resulting from the two compensa-ble accidents. Although there is competent, substantial evidence to support the award of permanent partial disability benefits, the deputy commissioner erred in failing to determine the date upon which claimant reached total maximum medical improvement as a result of the two accidents. It is improper to begin payment of permanent benefits without a determination of the date of total maximum medical improvement. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company v. Rollins, 390 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); South Carolina Insurance Company v. Blackman, 380 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Therefore, we remand on this point to allow a determination of the date upon which claimant reached total maximum medical improvement for her overall disability on this record.

All other points on appeal and cross-appeal are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM,

Appellant’s petition for rehearing and/or clarification is granted. We adhere to our opinion remanding the case to the deputy commissioner to allow a determination of the date upon which claimant reached overall maximum medical improvement for the permanent partial disability caused by the two industrial accidents. However, the deputy commissioner may take further evidence as may be absolutely necessary for[*1081] the limited purpose of determining the date of total maximum medical improvement.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.