Cochran v. State, 427 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Cochran v. State, 427 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Vazquez, 450 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1984)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1127 cited at this page1 citing case
  • State v. Vazquez, 450 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1984).published
    Moreover, "[t]here is no rule which requires the state to prove the [felony] charge for the court to retain jurisdiction." Vazquez, 427 So.2d at 1127 (Upchurch, J., dissenting) (emphasis in original).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oliver COCHRAN
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 83-243.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 15, 1983.
Published opinion
427 So. 2d 1125
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27946
Oliver Cochran, in pro. per., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Barkdull, Hubbart, Jorgenson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See Harvin v. State, 385 So.2d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Loconte v. State, 382 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Seymour v. State, 359 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Thornton v. State, 354 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Sec. 924.06(3), Fla. Stat. (1978); Rule 9.140(b) Fla.R.App.P.