State v. Gillum, 429 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Gillum, 429 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Florida
v.
Robert Henry GILLUM
No. 82-1995.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Apr 22, 1983.
Published opinion
429 So. 2d 1367
1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20755
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant., Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and John T. Kilcrease, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellee.
Boardman, Danahy, Grimes.
Published
DANAHY, Judge.

The state contends that the trial judge erred in granting the appellant’s motion to suppress Dilaudid pills as evidence against him. We agree.

In State v. Gillum, 428 So.2d 755, No. 82-1994 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), we reversed the trial judge’s order granting the motion[*1368] of the appellant’s wife to suppress the same Dilaudid pills discovered under the same circumstances as those present here. For the reasons stated in that opinion, we find that there was probable cause for the search which uncovered this evidence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.