green
Positive treatment
published
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.6 score
Cited for
Each provision in a contract must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.
- In the Matter of J. Lawrence Hill, Debtor. David v. Adler v. J. Lawrence Hill & Whitney Nat'l Bank, 981 F.2d 1474 (5th Cir. 1993).published(Each provision in a contract must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.)
- Matter of Hill, No. 91-9502 (5th Cir. Jan. 28, 1993).published(Each provision in a contract must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“each provision in a contract must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.”
- In the Matter of J. Lawrence Hill, Debtor. David v. Adler v. J. Lawrence Hill & Whitney Nat'l Bank, 981 F.2d 1474 (5th Cir. 1993).published“each provision in a contract must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.”
- Matter of Hill, No. 91-9502 (5th Cir. Jan. 28, 1993).published“each provision in a contract must be interpreted in light of the other provisions so that each is given the meaning suggested by the contract as a whole.”
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nora Lee CARTER
v.
P.K. SMITH CHEVROLET-OLDS INC.
v.
P.K. SMITH CHEVROLET-OLDS INC.
No. 83-C-2381.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Dec 16, 1983.
Published opinion
In re Nora Lee Carter, applying for writ of certiorari and review. Second Circuit Court of Appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Parish of Winn. No. 23590.
Denied.
DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.