Langston v. State, 444 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Langston v. State, 444 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Cipollina v. State, 501 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1157 “Having considered appellant’s request, we find that it is legally insufficient.”1 citing casethe opinion's own words at *1157
  • Cipollina v. State, 501 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).published
    Langston v. State, 444 So.2d 1156, 1157 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul Andrew LANGSTON
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 83-1784.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Feb 10, 1984.
Published opinion
444 So. 2d 1156
1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11711
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Campbell, Lehan, Ott.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from the denial of a motion seeking postconviction .relief under[*1157] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. An evidentiary hearing was held, and the trial court heard testimony and argument in support of appellant’s allegation concerning “newly discovered evidence.” We affirm the denial of appellant’s motion.

A claim of newly discovered evidence cannot be raised in a rule 3.850 motion. We treat this appeal as a request for permission to petition the trial court for writ of error coram nobis. See Hallman v. State, 343 So.2d 912 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), aff'd, 371 So.2d 482 (Fla.1979).

Having considered appellant’s request, we find that it is legally insufficient. The alleged facts are not “of such a vital nature that had they been known to the trial court, they conclusively would have prevented the entry of the judgment.” Hallman, 371 So.2d at 485 (citations omitted) (emphasis in original).

AFFIRMED.

OTT, C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.