No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruth E. BOWERS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lawrence Bowers, and individually
v.
FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
v.
FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
No. 83-1991.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 23, 1984.
Published opinion
Stanley Jay Bartel, Miami, for appellant., Peters, Pickle, Flynn, Niemoeller & Downs and Donna S. Catoe and Jackson L. Peters, Miami, for appellee.
Baskin, Genson, Hendry, Jor.
Published
PER CURIAM.
It is not the function of the appellate court to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court through reevaluation of the testimony and evidence. Finding that the judgment of the trial court is supported by competent evidence, we affirm. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203, 206 (Fla.1983); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Affirmed.