Bravo v. State, 499 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Bravo v. State, 499 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gilberto Martin BRAVO
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 86-1340.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Dec 30, 1986.
Published opinion
499 So. 2d 71
1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11141
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and May L. Cain, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant., Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard L. Polin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Baskin, Ferguson, Pearson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the adjudication and sentence without prejudice to defendant raising the issue pertaining to ineffectiveness of counsel in a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The remaining point lacks merit. See Mixon v. State, 497 So.2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Stokes v. State, 476 So.2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Affirmed.