Murphy v. State, 539 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Murphy v. State, 539 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph MURPHY
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 88-750.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 2, 1989.
Published opinion
539 So. 2d 22
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1024
1989 WL 16657
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Cowart, Daniel, Goshorn.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The order imposing costs under sections 960.20 and 27.3455(1), Florida Statutes, without notice or opportunity to be heard, violated appellant’s constitutional due process rights and is hereby reversed. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), and Brooks v. State, 490 So.2d 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Hollis v. State, 525 So.2d 498 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Morris v. State, 524 So.2d 494 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Riccard v. State, 514 So.2d 83 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Evins v. State, 497 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Gaffney v. State, 497 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1987); and Outar v. State, 508 So.2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

REVERSED.

COWART, DANIEL and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.