Capital Bank v. Manguart, 549 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Capital Bank v. Manguart, 549 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CAPITAL BANK
v.
Tony MANGUART, a/k/a Tony M. Manguart, etc., and Frank H. Alvarez
No. 89-523.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 26, 1989.
Published opinion
549 So. 2d 234
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197
1989 WL 110944
Ullman & Ullman, and Michael W. Ull-man, and Carlos L. De Zayas, North Miami Beach, for appellant., Frank Pintado, Miami, for appellees.
Gersten, Hubbart, Schwartz.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant Capital Bank appeals from a post-judgment order granting a motion for a protective order directing that the deposition of a nonparty witness, not be had. We quash the protective order. The deposition sought can proceed subject to claims of privilege to be brought before the trial court. See Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The protective order is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.