Tim v. State, 553 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Tim v. State, 553 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gesell v. State, 751 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Ve Ve Muriel TIM
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 87-00250.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Dec 8, 1989.
Published opinion
553 So. 2d 370
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850
1989 WL 147940
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Frank, Lehan, Parker.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to our prior decision in Sotolongo v. State, 530 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), in which we reversed the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence filed by appellant’s codefendant, and because the facts in both cases are indistinguishable, the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence is reversed. We reject the state’s argument that the “good faith” exception to the warrant requirement enunciated in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S.Ct. 3405, 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), should apply.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.