Hankton v. State, 563 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). · Go Syfert
Hankton v. State, 563 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Denise HANKTON
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 89-2196.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jul 3, 1990.
563 So. 2d 814
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joan L. Greenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Barkdull, Jorgenson, Nesbitt.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The trial court imposed certain court costs and other charges against the defendant, who was indigent, and conditioned her parole on the payment of these costs. We reverse under the following authorities, Shipley v. State, 528 So.2d 902 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), and strike the award of costs and the provisions of the probation order which conditioned the payment thereof. As modified, the order of probation is affirmed.