Arnold v. State, 572 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Arnold v. State, 572 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dennis ARNOLD
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 89-1132.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 16, 1991.
Published opinion
572 So. 2d 1026
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 218
1991 WL 2745
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sylvia Alonso, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Letts, Polen, Warner.
Published

Lead Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

We reverse and remand for a new trial. The reasons given by the prosecutor to justify the exercise of the peremptory challenge of a black juror are not supported anywhere in the record. See State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984); Floyd v. State, 569 So.2d 1225 (Fla.1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, J., concurs. WARNER, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurrence

WARNER, Judge,

concurs specially.

I concur in the reversal. However, on retrial I believe it would be error to admit the contents of a BOLO which described the defendant based on State v. Baird, 572 So.2d 904 (Fla.1990), and Harris v. State, 544 So.2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).