City of Plantation v. Vermut, 583 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). · Go Syfert
City of Plantation v. Vermut, 583 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 394 finding that although the violation order issued by the code enforcement board was not timely filed, the circuit court had jurisdiction to review the supplemental order/claim of lien, and remanding with instructions to limit review to supplemental order/claim of lien2 citing cases1 citing court put it this way
  • Hardin v. Monroe Cnty., 64 So. 3d 707 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).published 2 cites
    An appeal shall be filed within 30 days of the execution of the order to be appealed.”); City of Plantation v. Vermut, 583 So.2d 393, 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (“The result and effect of the order of the Broward circuit court was to set asid…
  • Kirby v. City of Archer, 790 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).published
    "Matters determined in an order which has become final without appeal are not later subject to appellate review...." City of Plantation v. Vermut, 583 So.2d 393, 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF PLANTATION, Florida, a Florida municipal corp.
v.
Daniel M. VERMUT and Susan H. Vermut, his wife
No. 91-0378.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jul 24, 1991.
Published opinion
583 So. 2d 393
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7073
1991 WL 134428
Larry A. Earns, Lunny, Tucker, Earns & Tighe, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner., Anthony J. Titone, Titone, Roarke & Ti-tone, Lauderhill, for respondents.
Anstead, Downey, Garrett.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The City of Plantation, Florida, seeks certiorari review of an October 19, 1990 order of the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, which set aside a final administrative order of the Plantation Code Enforcement Board. We grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order of the circuit court.

On March 29, 1988, the Plantation Code Enforcement Board entered an order finding respondents in violation of the code of ordinances. The order required respondents to be in compliance within three days, and subjected respondents to a fine for each day of noncompliance thereafter. Respondents did not appeal this final administrative order. See section 162.11, Fla.Stat. On May 3, 1988, the Board entered a supplemental order/claim of lien which confirmed and ratified the fine assessed in the[*394] earlier order and imposed a lien for the fine. Respondents appealed this supplemental order/claim of lien to the Broward County Circuit Court. In an order entered October 19, 1990, the circuit court set aside the final order of the code enforcement board and ordered that a new hearing be held.

Matters determined in an order which has become final without appeal are not later subject to appellate review simply because a later order affected those matters or applied them to other interlocutory matters under consideration. State ex rel. Sarasota County v. Boyer, 360 So.2d 388 (Fla.1978). The result and effect of the order of the Broward circuit court was to set aside the March 29, 1988 final order of violation and noncompliance of the Plantation Code Enforcement Board, as well as the May 3, 1988 supplemental order/claim of lien. Because no appeal had been taken from the March 29, 1988 final order, we find that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to set aside the March 29, 1988 final order. Proceedings on remand should be limited to a review of the May 3,1988 order and the May 2, 1988 hearing upon which it is based.

Certiorari is granted, the order of the circuit court is quashed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and GARRETT, JJ., concur.