No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony FORNEY
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 76900.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 27, 1992.
Published opinion
594 So. 2d 305
1992 Fla. LEXIS 189
1992 WL 34691
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Melvina Racey Flaherty, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.
Barkett, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, McDonald, Overton, Shaw.
Published
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Forney v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th D.C.A.1990), which certified the same question recently answered by the Court in Barfield v. State, 594 So.2d 259 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the[*306] opinion below and remand for reconsideration in light of Barfield.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.