Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, 209 F.3d 940 (6th Cir. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, 209 F.3d 940 (6th Cir. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
ScopeSuperseded by Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, Warden (2000): the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit's own en banc opinion in this case.
1 outright
Cite instead
Cite for current doctrine: Philip R. Workman v. Ricky Bell, 227 F.3d 331 (6th Cir. 2000)
17 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Paulino v. State, 924 A.2d 308 (Md. 2007)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 943 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Paulino v. State, 924 A.2d 308 (Md. 2007).published 2 cites
    Id. at 943-44 (emphasis added).
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip R. Workman
v.
Ricky Bell, Warden, Philip R. Workman, Movant
96-6652.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 4, 2000.
Published opinion
209 F.3d 940
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8819
Published

209 F.3d 940 (6th Cir. 2001)

Philip R. WORKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Philip R. Workman, Movant

No. 96-6652, 00-5367

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 4, 2000

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

[*~940–942]1

A majority of the Judges of this court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this matter en banc. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) it is ORDERED that the court's order of March 31, 2000 is vacated and the matter is restored to the court's active docket.

[*~941–943]2

It is further ORDERED that the petitioner shall file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, April 17, 2000, and the respondent shall file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, May 1, 2000. The Clerk will schedule the matter for oral argument at the earliest practicable date as directed by the court.

[*~943–944]3

The motion for a stay of the execution scheduled for April 6, 2000 is GRANTED, such stay to remain in effect until further order of the court.