City of Orlando v. Haynes, 263 So. 3d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). · Go Syfert
Search
City of Orlando v. Haynes, 263 So. 3d 285 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF ORLANDO
v.
Carlus L. HAYNES and Carlos M. Romero
Case No. 5D18-953.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Feb 5, 2019.
Published opinion
263 So. 3d 285
Derek J. Angell, of O'Connor & O'Connor, LLC, Orlando, for Appellant., Carlus L. Haynes, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, pro se, and Bradley N. Laurent, of Law Office of Haynes and Laurent, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee., No Appearance for Appellee, Carlos M. Romero.
Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 25%
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Hayes v. State, 94 So.3d 452, 461 (Fla. 2012) ("[T]he proper remedy when the trial court fails to abide by its duty under the Melbourne[ v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996) ] procedure is to reverse and remand for a new trial.").

EVANDER, C.J. and GROSSHANS and SASSO, JJ., concur.