red
Negative treatment
published
Overruled by James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washingto… (2007) ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
14.8 score
ScopeOverruled by James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation on other grounds: 6 citing opinions limit it to other grounds.
6 on other grounds
How later opinions annotate it (1 example)
- on other grounds
Simon v. Value Behavioral Health, Inc. , 208 F.3d 1073 , 1081 (9th Cir.), amended , 234 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 2000), overruled on other grounds by Odom v. Microsoft Corp. , 486 F.3d 541 (9th Cir. 2007).
— Roibas v. EBPA, LLC, 346 F. Supp. 3d 164 (D. Me. 2018)
Counts are distinct citing opinions whose annotation names this case. The flag stays red when any point is no longer good law; the scope says how far that reaches.
Cite instead
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Cited for
At page 433 Scope of actions under sections 7431 and 74333 citing casessecond and third alterations in original
- Koerner v. United States, 471 F. Supp. 2d 125 (D.D.C. 2007).published (second and third alterations in original)
- Evans v. United States, 478 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2007).published(noting that section 7431 actions can be brought for "disclosures that occur in connection with the determination of tax liability)
At page 428 cited at this page1 citing case
- Circle K Procurement & Brands Ltd. v. Goli Nutrition Inc., No. 2:23-cv-01417, 2024 WL 1639143 (D. Ariz. Apr. 16, 2024).Shwartz 234 F.3d at 428.
At page 432 cited at this page1 citing case
- Schroeder v. United States, 608 F. App'x 545 (9th Cir. 2015).unpublishedSee Shwarz, 234 F.3d at 432-33 (claim based on improper disclosure occurring in the course of tax collection activity must proceed under 26 U.S.C. § 7433 , not under 26 U.S.C. § 7431 ); see also 26 U.S.C. § 6103 (k)(6) (authorizing disclos…
At page 435 The court need not accept as true ... allegations that contradict facts that may be judicially noticed by the court.1 citing case
- Park Townsend, LLC v. Clarendon Am. Ins., 916 F. Supp. 2d 1045 (N.D. Cal. 2013).published(The court need not accept as true ... allegations that contradict facts that may be judicially noticed by the court.)
Other citing cases
- Pierce v. New Hampshire Dep't of Child. Youth & Families, No. 2:23-cv-00646 (D. Ariz. July 24, 2023).
- Jurado v. Ramirez, No. 4:20-cv-08602 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021).
- Witczak v. Lozano, No. 4:20-cv-01566 (N.D. Cal. July 27, 2021).
- Sebastian Brown Prods., LLC v. Muzooka, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (N.D. Cal. 2015).published
- Adams v. Johnson, 355 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 2004).published
- Wills v. Pompey, 8 F. App'x 647 (9th Cir. 2001).unpublished
- Stephen Simon v. Value Behavioral Health, Inc., 208 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2000).published
- Wilkins, No. 4:25-cv-06426 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2025).
- (PC) Johnson v. Kuersten, No. 2:21-cv-00828 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2025).
- (PC) Brooks v. Newsom, No. 2:23-cv-00481 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2024).
Show 16 more citing cases
- (PC) Hall v. Gary, No. 2:23-cv-00680 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2024).
- (PC) Allen v. Sacramento Cnty., No. 2:21-cv-00344 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2023).
- (PC) Calderon v. Covello, No. 2:23-cv-01974 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2023).
- (PC) Martin v. Allison, No. 1:22-cv-00914 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2022).
- (PC) Smith v. Santoro, No. 1:21-cv-01329 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022).
- (PC) Singh v. Devine, No. 1:22-cv-00061 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2022).
- (PC) Kulp v. Stanislaus Cnty. Sheriff Dep't, No. 1:22-cv-00829 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2022).
- (PC) Martin v. De La Cruz, No. 1:22-cv-00812 (E.D. Cal. July 27, 2022).
- (PC) Medina Vasquez v. Sheriff, No. 1:20-cv-00557 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2021).
- Guzman v. Jones, No. 4:19-cv-03757-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2021).
- (pc) Quair v. CDCR HQ, No. 2:19-cv-01106 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2020).
- (PC) Brock v. Tuolumne Cnty. Sheriffs, No. 1:17-cv-01610 (E.D. Cal. May 15, 2020).
- (PC) Dunbar v. California Corr. Dep't, No. 2:19-cv-01359 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2020).
- (PC) Cassells v. Villa, No. 2:18-cv-02457 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2019).
- Ismail v. Freeman, 936 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (C.D. Cal. 2012).published
- Ismail v. Cnty. of Orange, 917 F. Supp. 2d 1060 (C.D. Cal. 2012).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stephen SIMON, an Individual and as Assignee of Assignors, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
VALUE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
v.
VALUE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
98-55905.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 7, 2000.
Published opinion
234 F.3d 428
2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9723
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31135
2000 WL 1785282
Nelson, Rymer.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
ORDER
The opinion filed March 17, 2000, appearing at 208 F.3d 1073, (9th Cir.2000), is amended as follows:
Page 1076, caption: change Defendants-Appellants to Defendants-Appellees, and add Specialty Medical Clinic, Inc. and Specialty Medical Clinic Inc. Employee Benefit Plan at the end of the list of defendants-appellees.