Blanco v. State, 636 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Blanco v. State, 636 So. 2d 588 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ralph BLANCO
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 93-298.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 13, 1994.
Published opinion
636 So. 2d 588
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4589
1994 WL 182722
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Lyle Hitchens, Asst. Public Defender, Dayto-na Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Cobb, Goshorn, Harris.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We reverse because we conclude the trial court applied the incorrect standard when denying a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. On remand, the court shall reconsider the motion and apply the standard set forth by the supreme court in Jones v. State, 591 So.2d 911 (Fla.1991).

We find no merit in appellant’s remaining point on appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.