Hessler v. T & N, PLC, 642 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Hessler v. T & N, PLC, 642 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lorraine HESSLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Hessler
v.
T & N, PLC, f/k/a Turner & Newall, pic
No. 93-2834.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 5, 1994.
Published opinion
642 So. 2d 851
1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9498
1994 WL 535086
David M. Lipman and Daniel A. Brown, Miami, for appellant., Spohrer Wilner & Maxwell and Norwood S. Wilner, Jacksonville, for appellee.
Levy, Nesbitt, Schwartz.
Published
PER CURIAM.

The appellant has failed to demonstrate error or abuse of discretion in (a) the trial court’s exclusion of proposed rebuttal testimony, see Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So.2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), or (b) any ruling as to the elements of the plaintiff’s strict liability claim. See Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir.1985).

Affirmed.