G.A.Z. v. State, 657 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
G.A.Z. v. State, 657 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
G.A.Z.
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 94-01273.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jul 7, 1995.
Published opinion
657 So. 2d 1244
1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 7332
1995 WL 396374
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Danahy, Quince, Threadgill.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the amount ordered for restitution because there was sufficient competent evidence to find (1) that the appellant took the signet ring the victim inherited from her father during the burglary for which he was adjudicated delinquent and (2) the ring’s replacement value. However, we strike that part of the order delegating the responsibility for setting the terms and conditions of the payment of the restitution. Only the trial court may set such terms. Denson v. State, 493 So.2d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); McDonald v. State, 478 So.2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

We remand for further proceedings so the trial court may set the terms and conditions of repayment.

THREADGILL, C.J., and DANAHY and QUINCE, JJ., concur.