Somerset on Lake Saunders, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 725 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Somerset on Lake Saunders, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 725 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
At page 421 cited at this page1 citing case
  • State v. Florida, 894 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2005).published
    The Fourth District stated in Gresham that "both the pleading and the evidence relied on by the state at trial are consistent with the stabbing being committed as part of the attempted second degree murder." 725 So.2d at 421.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SOMERSET ON LAKE SAUNDERS, INC.
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
No. 98-1479.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jan 22, 1999.
Published opinion
725 So. 2d 421
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 489
1999 WL 22396
Jason H. Clark, West Palm Beach, for Appellant., John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Antoon, Griffin, Thompson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Somerset on Lake Saunders, Inc. (Somerset) appeals the order entered by the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) affirming the decision of the appeals referee that Marlene Hutcheson is entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.

Somerset first maintains that Ms. Hutche-son is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits because she voluntarily terminated her employment without good cause attributable to her employer. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). However, the record evidence supports the conclusion reached by the appeals referee that Ms. Hutcheson sustained her burden of proving that she did not voluntarily quit her job, but instead her employment was terminated by Somerset.

Next, Somerset contends that Ms. Hutche-son is not entitled to receive unemployment compensation benefits because she was discharged for misconduct. See § 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1997). Again, the record supports the appeals referee’s finding that Ms. Hutcheson did not engage in any misconduct. Accordingly, we affirm. See Brooks v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 695 So.2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.