Miami Tiresoles, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 732 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1999). · Go Syfert
Miami Tiresoles, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 732 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miami Tiresoles, Inc.
v.
Department of Revenue
No. 91,055.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 8, 1999.
Published opinion
732 So. 2d 322
1999 Fla. LEXIS 571
1999 WL 189836
Norman S. Segall, R. Hugh Lumpkin, and Karl J. Schumer of Keith/Mack' LLP, Miami, Florida, for Petitioners., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Eric J. Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.
Anstead, Harding, Overton, Shaw, Wells.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We have for review Miami Tiresoles, Inc. v. State Department of Revenue, 695 So.2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), in which the Third District certified the following question as one of great public importance:

WHETHER DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE V. KUHNLEIN, 646 So.2d 717 (Fla.1994), CERT. DENIED, 515 S.Ct. [U.S.] 1158, 115 S.Ct. 2608, 132 L.Ed.2d 853 (1995), OVERRULED OR RECEDED FROM STATE EX RED. VICTOR CHEMICAL WORKS V. GAY, 74 So.2d 560 (Fla.1954)?

Id. at 851. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently answered a substantially similar question in the negative. See Department of Revenue v. Nemeth, 733 So.2d 970 (Fla.1999). Accordingly, on the authority of Nemeth, we answer the certified question in the negative and remand this case for proceedings consistent with our opinion therein.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., SHAW, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and OVERTON, Senior Justice, concur.