Adams v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 734 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Adams v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 734 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vonsher Adams
v.
Florida Parole Commission
No. 99-0948.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jul 7, 1999.
Published opinion
734 So. 2d 603
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9110
1999 WL 454505
Vonsher Adams, pro se, petitioner., No appearance for respondent.
Joanos, Kahn, Padovano.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus without affording petitioner the opportunity to reply to respondent’s response below. See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So.2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, the trial court’s order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is quashed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

JOANOS, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur.