Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp., 745 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp., 745 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marvin GARCIA
v.
U.S. FLORAL CORPORATION
No. 99-1394.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 3, 1999.
Published opinion
745 So. 2d 429
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618
1999 WL 993073
Robert J. Schaffer, Coral Gables; Martinez & Gutierrez, Renaldy J. Gutierrez and Kathleen M. Sales, Miami, for appellant., Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Gregg J. Breit-bart and Sherry D. Williams, Miami, for appellee.
Fletcher, Goderich, Sorondo.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Because the plaintiff, U.S. Floral Corporation, presented sufficient evidence of a legitimate business interest justifying the restrictive covenant, § 542.335, Fla. Stat. (1999), and irreparable harm, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610, we affirm the trial court’s entry of a temporary injunction. See Aero Kool Corp. v. Oosthuizen, 736 So.2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Affirmed.