Harmening v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 748 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Harmening v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 748 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William A. HARMENING
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 99-33.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 12, 1999.
Published opinion
748 So. 2d 1048
1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14923
1999 WL 1024089
Nolan Carter and Karen R. Wasson, Orlando, for Appellant., Wiley Andrew Rariden of David A. Sierra & Associates, Orlando, for Appellee.
Cobb, Dauksch, Jacobus.
Published

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174 (Fla.1993).

COBB, J. and JACOBUS, B., Associate Judge, concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Concurrence

DAUKSCH, J.,

concurring.

I concur and write only to say briefly that appellant seems to believe that “concurrent cause” and “aggravation of a preexisting condition” are the same legal concepts. I do not believe so.