Espirit v. State, 750 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Espirit v. State, 750 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Curtis ESPIRIT
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D00-66.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 2, 2000.
Published opinion
750 So. 2d 150
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 916
2000 WL 121505
Curtis Espirit, in proper person., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Cope, Jorgenson, Levy.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a two-page conclusory motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which did not explain the basis for any of appellant’s claims. The motion was properly denied. On appeal, defendant has filed a forty-six page brief which outlines his position, but the arguments he now makes were never made to the trial court. Accordingly we do not consider them.

This affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to refile a proper Rule 3.850 motion. In so saying, we do not express any opinion on the merits of appellant’s claims.

Affirmed.