Henriquez-Cox v. State, 751 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Henriquez-Cox v. State, 751 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharon HENRIQUEZ-COX
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D99-2357.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 8, 2000.
Published opinion
751 So. 2d 775
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2214
2000 WL 256577
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Maria E. Lauredo, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Cope, Jorgenson, Levy.
Published

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The defendant challenges her sentence under the 1995 Sentencing Guidelines on the ground that chapter 95-184, the enacting legislation, violated the single subject requirement of the Florida Constitution. Based upon the State’s candid and correct confession of error and the Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in Heggs v. State, No. SC93851, - So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb.17, 2000), we reverse.

[*776] Accordingly, we remand to the trial court for resentencing under the guidelines in effect prior to the enactment of chapter 95-184.

Reversed and remanded.