Dial v. State, 752 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1999). · Go Syfert
Dial v. State, 752 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Susan DIAL
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 95,507.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 16, 1999.
Published opinion
752 So. 2d 555
1999 Fla. LEXIS 2176
1999 WL 1190748
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, West Palm Beach, and' Leslie T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
Anstead, Harding, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Shaw, Wells.
Published
PARIENTE, J.

We have for review State v. Dial 730 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinions in State v. Holland, 689 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), and State v. Perry, 716 So.2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For reasons expressed in our opinion in Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), the decision of the Fourth District is hereby quashed. We remand to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.