Univ. Pine Ret. v. Myers, 752 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Univ. Pine Ret. v. Myers, 752 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNIVERSITY PINE RETIREMENT and Wausau Insurance Company
v.
Sherri MYERS
No. 1D99-2546.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 13, 2000.
752 So. 2d 1259
Kimberly A. Wilson of Sharp & Gay, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioners., T. Rhett Smith of T. Rhett Smith, P.A., Pensacola, for Respondent.
Kahn, Padovano, Webster.
Published
PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the employer/earrier (E/C) petition this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order entered by the judge of compensation claims (JCC). The order at issue granted the claimant’s motion for a protective order and provided that a rehabilitation nurse hired by the E/C could not communicate ex parte with any health care provider involved in this case because the nurse was an independent contractor, not a “direct ‘in-house’ employee” of the E/C. In support of their petition, the E/C argue only that rehabilitation providers are included in section 440.13(4)(e), Florida Statutes, as among those authorized to conduct ex parte communications with a claimant’s health care providers. We deny the petition.

KAHN, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, CONCUR.