Reed v. State, 768 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Reed v. State, 768 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Gould v. State, 948 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1239 “[a] motion for post-conviction relief filed solely for the purpose of obtaining a belated appeal does not render a subsequent post-conviction relief motion successive when the latter motion alleges ineffective assistance of counsel based on other grounds”1 citing case1 citing court quotes it
  • Gould v. State, 948 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).published
    “[a] motion for post-conviction relief filed solely for the purpose of obtaining a belated appeal does not render a subsequent post-conviction relief motion successive when the latter motion alleges ineffective assistanc…”
Royce REED
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D00-2291.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 11, 2000.
Published opinion
768 So. 2d 1239
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13212
2000 WL 1504979
Royce Reed, in proper person., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Fletcher, Schwartz, Shevin.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We reverse, in part, the order denying defendant’s post conviction relief motion. The court erred in denying the motion as successive. A motion for post-conviction relief filed solely for the purpose of obtaining a belated appeal does not render a subsequent post-conviction relief motion successive when the latter motion alleges ineffective assistance of counsel based on other grounds. Owens v. State, 721 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Kiser v. State, 649 So.2d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

We therefore reverse that portion of the order denying defendant relief on ineffective assistance of trial counsel grounds. However, we affirm, without prejudice, the portion of the order that denies relief based on ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as that claim is more properly raised by petition pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.