Cetma Jet, Inc. v. Torres, 787 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Cetma Jet, Inc. v. Torres, 787 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cetma Jet, Inc., etc.
v.
Ricardo Torres
No. 3D00-1968.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 13, 2001.
Published opinion
787 So. 2d 960
2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8052
2001 WL 649326
Rodriguez & Angelo and Paulino A. Nú-ñez, Jr., Miami; Homer, Bonner & Delgado and Lawrence Bonner and Justin C. Fineberg, Miami, for appellants., Mark A. Kamilar, Coconut Grove, for appellees.
Fletcher, Goderich, Jorgenson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

In an action for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, Cetma Jet, Inc. appeals from a final judgment. We affirm.

In the Asset Purchase Agreement that formed the contractual basis of the sale of Cetma to Aerothrust, Cetma assigned to Aerothrust all rights that arose out of Cetma’s contracts. The claims that Cetma brought against Torres fall within that category, and are thus barred. See W.S. Badcock Corp. v. Webb, 699 So.2d 859 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Escandar v. Southern Mgmt. & Inv. Corp., 534 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.