green
Positive treatment
published
4.3 score
Cited for
relying significantly upon evidence that the suppliers re-packaged the asbestos insulation in boxes containing the suppliers’ respective names to support a finding that defendants were professional vendors
- Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co., No. 2:20-cv-02389 (E.D. La. Aug. 16, 2022).(relying significantly upon evidence that the suppliers re-packaged the asbestos insulation in boxes containing the suppliers’ respective names to support a finding that defendants were professional vendors)
- Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co., No. 2:20-cv-02389 (E.D. La. July 28, 2022).(relying significantly upon evidence that the suppliers re-packaged the asbestos insulation in boxes containing the suppliers’ respective names to support a finding that defendants were professional vendors)
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barry HOERNER and Peggy Rieffel Hoerner
v.
ANCO INSULATIONS, INC. ACandS, Inc. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (Formerly Armstrong Cork Company) Asbestos Claims Management Corporation (Formerly National Gypsum Company) the Babcock & Wilcox Company Branton Insulations, Inc.
v.
ANCO INSULATIONS, INC. ACandS, Inc. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (Formerly Armstrong Cork Company) Asbestos Claims Management Corporation (Formerly National Gypsum Company) the Babcock & Wilcox Company Branton Insulations, Inc.
No. 2002-C-0935.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 21, 2002.
Published opinion
Published
In re Benjamin-Foster; AmChem Products Inc.; — -Defendants; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. A, No. 95-18815; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-CA-2333.
Denied.